Skip to main content
replaced http://english.stackexchange.com/ with https://english.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

I didn't find it off-putting until you mentioned it (perhaps I'm just accustomed to the CSS styling used for beta sites). Historically when people ask about styling their beta site, SE have said they'll give a site custom styling when it graduates from beta.

You're right that the colours could look ... warmer. So I up-voted your suggestion on meta.SE.

The block quotes don't bother me, because they're functional:

  • Readable (dark text on pale background)
  • Distinct (easy to see the difference between quote and non-quote)

The first thing (and almost the only difference) I see when I looked at the example style you posted is that the non-content (extreme left and right) margin is yellow. Content remains black-on-white, with yellow (or do you see that more as a distinctly orange shade of yellow?) for the block quote.

It has a yellow instead of blueish top banner though, too, so "warmer colours" overall (as you said) instead of "the yellow+blue look".

If you look at a page of a graduated SE site like this one, the margin is coloured (a slightly greenish blue) and the content background is still a plain near-white. Maybe (I'm not a style designer) a whiteish background works easily because it accepts various-coloured text (including colours for links and visited links). And the block quote is yellow.

Still, some SE sites have non-white content, for example this onethis one, so that's not impossible either.

I didn't find it off-putting until you mentioned it (perhaps I'm just accustomed to the CSS styling used for beta sites). Historically when people ask about styling their beta site, SE have said they'll give a site custom styling when it graduates from beta.

You're right that the colours could look ... warmer. So I up-voted your suggestion on meta.SE.

The block quotes don't bother me, because they're functional:

  • Readable (dark text on pale background)
  • Distinct (easy to see the difference between quote and non-quote)

The first thing (and almost the only difference) I see when I looked at the example style you posted is that the non-content (extreme left and right) margin is yellow. Content remains black-on-white, with yellow (or do you see that more as a distinctly orange shade of yellow?) for the block quote.

It has a yellow instead of blueish top banner though, too, so "warmer colours" overall (as you said) instead of "the yellow+blue look".

If you look at a page of a graduated SE site like this one, the margin is coloured (a slightly greenish blue) and the content background is still a plain near-white. Maybe (I'm not a style designer) a whiteish background works easily because it accepts various-coloured text (including colours for links and visited links). And the block quote is yellow.

Still, some SE sites have non-white content, for example this one, so that's not impossible either.

I didn't find it off-putting until you mentioned it (perhaps I'm just accustomed to the CSS styling used for beta sites). Historically when people ask about styling their beta site, SE have said they'll give a site custom styling when it graduates from beta.

You're right that the colours could look ... warmer. So I up-voted your suggestion on meta.SE.

The block quotes don't bother me, because they're functional:

  • Readable (dark text on pale background)
  • Distinct (easy to see the difference between quote and non-quote)

The first thing (and almost the only difference) I see when I looked at the example style you posted is that the non-content (extreme left and right) margin is yellow. Content remains black-on-white, with yellow (or do you see that more as a distinctly orange shade of yellow?) for the block quote.

It has a yellow instead of blueish top banner though, too, so "warmer colours" overall (as you said) instead of "the yellow+blue look".

If you look at a page of a graduated SE site like this one, the margin is coloured (a slightly greenish blue) and the content background is still a plain near-white. Maybe (I'm not a style designer) a whiteish background works easily because it accepts various-coloured text (including colours for links and visited links). And the block quote is yellow.

Still, some SE sites have non-white content, for example this one, so that's not impossible either.

replaced http://bicycles.stackexchange.com/ with https://bicycles.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

I didn't find it off-putting until you mentioned it (perhaps I'm just accustomed to the CSS styling used for beta sites). Historically when people ask about styling their beta site, SE have said they'll give a site custom styling when it graduates from beta.

You're right that the colours could look ... warmer. So I up-voted your suggestion on meta.SE.

The block quotes don't bother me, because they're functional:

  • Readable (dark text on pale background)
  • Distinct (easy to see the difference between quote and non-quote)

The first thing (and almost the only difference) I see when I looked at the example style you posted is that the non-content (extreme left and right) margin is yellow. Content remains black-on-white, with yellow (or do you see that more as a distinctly orange shade of yellow?) for the block quote.

It has a yellow instead of blueish top banner though, too, so "warmer colours" overall (as you said) instead of "the yellow+blue look".

If you look at a page of a graduated SE site like this onelike this one, the margin is coloured (a slightly greenish blue) and the content background is still a plain near-white. Maybe (I'm not a style designer) a whiteish background works easily because it accepts various-coloured text (including colours for links and visited links). And the block quote is yellow.

Still, some SE sites have non-white content, for example this one, so that's not impossible either.

I didn't find it off-putting until you mentioned it (perhaps I'm just accustomed to the CSS styling used for beta sites). Historically when people ask about styling their beta site, SE have said they'll give a site custom styling when it graduates from beta.

You're right that the colours could look ... warmer. So I up-voted your suggestion on meta.SE.

The block quotes don't bother me, because they're functional:

  • Readable (dark text on pale background)
  • Distinct (easy to see the difference between quote and non-quote)

The first thing (and almost the only difference) I see when I looked at the example style you posted is that the non-content (extreme left and right) margin is yellow. Content remains black-on-white, with yellow (or do you see that more as a distinctly orange shade of yellow?) for the block quote.

It has a yellow instead of blueish top banner though, too, so "warmer colours" overall (as you said) instead of "the yellow+blue look".

If you look at a page of a graduated SE site like this one, the margin is coloured (a slightly greenish blue) and the content background is still a plain near-white. Maybe (I'm not a style designer) a whiteish background works easily because it accepts various-coloured text (including colours for links and visited links). And the block quote is yellow.

Still, some SE sites have non-white content, for example this one, so that's not impossible either.

I didn't find it off-putting until you mentioned it (perhaps I'm just accustomed to the CSS styling used for beta sites). Historically when people ask about styling their beta site, SE have said they'll give a site custom styling when it graduates from beta.

You're right that the colours could look ... warmer. So I up-voted your suggestion on meta.SE.

The block quotes don't bother me, because they're functional:

  • Readable (dark text on pale background)
  • Distinct (easy to see the difference between quote and non-quote)

The first thing (and almost the only difference) I see when I looked at the example style you posted is that the non-content (extreme left and right) margin is yellow. Content remains black-on-white, with yellow (or do you see that more as a distinctly orange shade of yellow?) for the block quote.

It has a yellow instead of blueish top banner though, too, so "warmer colours" overall (as you said) instead of "the yellow+blue look".

If you look at a page of a graduated SE site like this one, the margin is coloured (a slightly greenish blue) and the content background is still a plain near-white. Maybe (I'm not a style designer) a whiteish background works easily because it accepts various-coloured text (including colours for links and visited links). And the block quote is yellow.

Still, some SE sites have non-white content, for example this one, so that's not impossible either.

added 64 characters in body
Source Link
ChrisW Mod
  • 47.4k
  • 15
  • 20

I don'tdidn't find it off-putting until you mentioned it (perhaps I'm just accustomed to the CSS styling used for beta sites). Historically when people ask about styling their beta site, SE have said they'll give a site custom styling when it graduates from beta.

I findYou're right that the colours could look ... warmer. So I up-voted your suggestion on meta.SE.

The block quotes OK (functional)don't bother me, because they're functional:

  • Readable (dark text on pale background)
  • Distinct (easy to see the difference between quote and non-quote)

Historically when people ask about styling their beta site, SE have said they'll give a site custom styling when it graduates from beta.

I've up-voted your question/suggestion on meta.SE though: because why not.

The first thing (and almost the only difference) I see when I looked at the example style you posted is that the non-content (extreme left and right) margin is yellow. Content remains black-on-white, with yellow (or do you see that more as a distinctly orange shade of yellow?) for the block quote.

It has a yellow instead of blueish top banner though, too, so "warmer colours" overall (as you said) instead of "the yellow+blue look".

If you look at a page of a graduated SE site like this one, the margin is coloured (see aa slightly grenishgreenish blue) and the content background is still the simple neara plain near-white. Maybe (I'm not a style designer) a whiteish background is goodworks easily because it accepts various-coloured text (including colours for links and visited links). And the block quote is yellow.

Still, some SE sites have non-white content, for example this one, so that's not impossible either.

I don't find it off-putting (perhaps I'm just accustomed to the CSS styling used for beta sites).

I find the block quotes OK (functional):

  • Readable (dark text on pale background)
  • Distinct (easy to see the difference between quote and non-quote)

Historically when people ask about styling their beta site, SE have said they'll give a site custom styling when it graduates from beta.

I've up-voted your question/suggestion on meta.SE though: because why not.

The first thing (and almost the only difference) I see when I looked at the example style you posted is that the non-content (extreme left and right) margin is yellow. Content remains black-on-white, with yellow (or do you see that more as a distinctly orange shade of yellow?) for the block quote.

It has a yellow instead of blueish top banner though, too, so "warmer colours" overall (as you said) instead of "the yellow+blue look".

If you look at a page of a graduated SE site like this one, the margin is coloured (see a slightly grenish blue) and the content background is still the simple near-white. Maybe (I'm not a style designer) a whiteish background is good because it accepts various-coloured text (including colours for links and visited links). And the block quote is yellow.

Still, some SE sites have non-white content, for example this one, so that's not impossible either.

I didn't find it off-putting until you mentioned it (perhaps I'm just accustomed to the CSS styling used for beta sites). Historically when people ask about styling their beta site, SE have said they'll give a site custom styling when it graduates from beta.

You're right that the colours could look ... warmer. So I up-voted your suggestion on meta.SE.

The block quotes don't bother me, because they're functional:

  • Readable (dark text on pale background)
  • Distinct (easy to see the difference between quote and non-quote)

The first thing (and almost the only difference) I see when I looked at the example style you posted is that the non-content (extreme left and right) margin is yellow. Content remains black-on-white, with yellow (or do you see that more as a distinctly orange shade of yellow?) for the block quote.

It has a yellow instead of blueish top banner though, too, so "warmer colours" overall (as you said) instead of "the yellow+blue look".

If you look at a page of a graduated SE site like this one, the margin is coloured (a slightly greenish blue) and the content background is still a plain near-white. Maybe (I'm not a style designer) a whiteish background works easily because it accepts various-coloured text (including colours for links and visited links). And the block quote is yellow.

Still, some SE sites have non-white content, for example this one, so that's not impossible either.

Source Link
ChrisW Mod
  • 47.4k
  • 15
  • 20
Loading