Timeline for Why do answers, questions, comments, suddenly disappear (and sometimes reappear)?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
22 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2017 at 12:18 | comment | added | ChrisW Mod | @SamanaJohann Thank you, I didn't realise that was difficult. I think there's also another link to Meta under that question-mark icon on the toolbar (see the answers to How do users navigate to Meta? for further illustrations). | |
| Oct 25, 2017 at 10:32 | comment | added | user11235 | Just found the new placing of the link to meta, for the case you like to inform the community members so that they could find here: [![enter image description here][1]][1] [1]: i.sstatic.net/cYa1R.jpg | |
| Oct 24, 2017 at 17:16 | comment | added | user11235 | Propably certain strong rebukes and approaches have been not on account of the mods in the past... so for all cases where such was unreasonable met, a "pardon" would be proper, but it should be not forgotten, that assosiation, even if can be just assumed, with fools brings pain. | |
| Oct 24, 2017 at 17:10 | comment | added | user11235 | Considered this a little, meaning to accept being voluntary under control of certain "emements" who are not shameful to ly, steal, kill impose seperations... it's maybe really better to walk on here. There are certain things which should be abounded by avoiding. "... fermentations to be abandoned by avoiding? ... in the sorts of unsuitable seats, wandering to the sorts of unsuitable habitats, and associating with the sorts of bad friends that would make his knowledgeable friends in the holy life suspect him of evil conduct." | |
| Oct 24, 2017 at 16:55 | comment | added | user11235 | That means 4000 is equal moderator on action, and people with 5000 are even able to look into privacy of useres... holly, and their act will be 90% count just on offical faces. Well, good conduct helps nevertheless. In regard of wellbeing in the current, one migh suffer if hoping for good estimate, be suspected by fellows to accosiate with certain acts. Well, it should be so. Profit is always earned best by lack of awarness by the consumer. | |
| Oct 24, 2017 at 16:18 | comment | added | ChrisW Mod | This page lists the site's moderators. | |
| Oct 24, 2017 at 14:22 | comment | added | user11235 | Btw. "This question came from our site for people practicing or interested in Buddhist philosophy, teaching, and practice." Sure? And, if certain people (can) act like mods, the effects will nevertheless fall back on the mods, since it is assumed that they are in charge. Which could be unpleasant, but a cause of not taking, showing distance, aside of not collective acts and their effects. | |
| Oct 24, 2017 at 13:31 | comment | added | user11235 | taking to arrange ones properbly easier ways, is not proper, as being member or to sign contracts not really is. Is already "hard" on the edge as it is, if remember older discussions, infos, Nyom Chris. You are no owner here at all, so you properply could not give what is not yours, given to you, personal, knowingly. In all terms one depends on attentivness and hostility of others. Sometimes one stands therefor in the rain, while other sit under a roof and talk theoretical. Thats ok. | |
| Oct 24, 2017 at 13:27 | comment | added | ChrisW Mod | Assuming you have an email address, you may be able to register it here: openid.stackexchange.com/account/register ... after which you can log-in. | |
| Oct 24, 2017 at 13:25 | comment | added | user11235 | And again, like told in the picture, the links from and back main and meta, or missing on the "new" theme. | |
| Oct 24, 2017 at 13:21 | comment | added | user11235 | "Yes you have to be a logged..." so can Chris Inform @Lanka that (like most), a not favoring his wishes have deeper reasons which are always not like assumed motivated. My person can like often, not fullfil, either technical or ethical, certain wishes and request. | |
| Oct 24, 2017 at 13:18 | comment | added | ChrisW Mod | ... see e.g. See e.g. meta.stackexchange.com/questions/68524/… and meta.stackexchange.com/questions/42267/… and so on. I think that to "register" a user account, you may need to give an email address or something like that. | |
| Oct 24, 2017 at 13:18 | comment | added | user11235 | "you ought to be able to see a "delete" link at the bottom of all your answers", is that for sure? Nicca: "Yes (a lot of my written answers are like that)." As the next tries... answer. It IS "me, my self and I", unchangeable, real. :-) Don't' reflect! D.O. could be seen, just give sanna-khandha (remember-aggregat) value. | |
| Oct 24, 2017 at 13:17 | comment | added | ChrisW Mod | Yes you have to be a logged-in user to post on Meta, with a reputation of at least 5 (see here for details). That means Meta is available to every user who is a member of the site (i.e. who has posted on the main site and received at least one up-vote from another user). I guess restricting it to only logged-in users helps reduce spam or something (e.g. other off-topic posts) on Meta. Do you find it hard to log-in? I notice your user account is "unregistered" ... | |
| Oct 24, 2017 at 13:08 | comment | added | user11235 | Found this (our of protocol-) way to forward possible good if known info's and comments: i.sstatic.net/MlOSY.jpg Please stop posting Meta-content on the main site. Thanks. | |
| Oct 24, 2017 at 12:54 | comment | added | ChrisW Mod |
the answers possibilities are not used, merely just like in a help-center answered ... No reflections, but "just" it IS such and such Yes (a lot of my written answers are like that).
|
|
| Oct 24, 2017 at 12:41 | comment | added | ChrisW Mod | See How does deleting work? What can cause a post to be deleted, and what does that actually mean? What are the criteria for deletion? for further details. | |
| Oct 24, 2017 at 12:40 | comment | added | ChrisW Mod | 1. Any user can always easily delete any answer of their own (for example you ought to be able to see a "delete" link at the bottom of all your answers). If a user does delete an answer of their own, moderators will see that deletion and they will usually do/say nothing about it. If a user tries to delete many or all of their past answers, then moderators might see that as "vandalism" and prevent it (e.g. moderators might undelete the answer; and/or delete the user but not the answer, so that the answer remains but no longer associated with the user). | |
| Oct 24, 2017 at 12:34 | comment | added | user11235 | In regard of improvements ot elementary sequences, the answers possibilities are not used, but merely just like in a help-center answered. So the main "gift", since not a matter of "gone, thats nature" or carelessness, is not addressed here. No reflections, but "just" it IS such and such. | |
| Oct 24, 2017 at 12:30 | comment | added | user11235 | Sadhu for the great effort to try to explain, Nyom Chris. Obiviously Chris has much joy in giving information of site and sequences. Mudita. 3 Things: 1. "Anyone who posts an answer can delete their own answer (and any comments under that answer) -- moderators will usually (not always) allow users to delete their own answers", ther seems to be a contradiction. 2. Could it be that not- members can technical not delete their answer/question (or wher would a link for such be found). How many reputation would a non-mod need to act like phantomas? Can "power" be seen? Mod-actors be known? | |
| Oct 24, 2017 at 12:29 | history | edited | ChrisWMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 218 characters in body
|
| Oct 24, 2017 at 12:00 | history | answered | ChrisWMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
