Aside of the possible incapacity of what is misleading and what is proper by those in charge here, and the fact, that even those in charge here would not react but simply stick with their opinions and views, even if you would do like suggested by Upasaka Chris one would get this form the Canon opposing side:
We've noticed that you have a pattern of engaging in lengthy
discussions in comments, frequently consisting of responses involving
multiple, back-to-back posts. ''Comments are intended as brief messages
to provide feedback, add minor information, ask for clarification, or
discuss the content of the post.'' Lengthy clarifications should be
edited into the post itself or posted separately as a new question or
answer, and extended discussions should be taken to chat. Extensive
comment threads tend to be a distraction for other readers. These
lengthy discussions are often hard to follow, and can easily hide
Preferring to argue with other users in comments over revising your
questions and answers to address their concerns is a red flag to
moderators, indicating you may not fully understand the purpose of
Stack Exchange: our goal is to provide readers with expert questions
and answers, not host discussion or debate. If you desire
conversation, stop into the site's chat room.
We hope that you can work with the community on achieving our goals
Asking specific, researched, relevant, on-topic questions
Providing clear, useful, accurate and well-researched information in answers
Treating others with respect and civility
We have temporarily suspended your account; you may return after 7
Regards, Sri Lanka Buddhism Stack Exchange moderator
Whether you believe it or not here are real problems and they begin with the honest answer of "What is your aim? What are you loyal to?" If that is not primarily the Tripple Gems but simply use them as a means of livelihood and entertainment, or what ever one feel comfortable by using them, then once again, you do neither something good for your self nor for others.
This community objectives contradict the Dhamma objectives in that way as it is about gaining, amassing, having a benefit form it, and putting welfare and joy above Dhamma and truth.
Atma fears that your as a hole can not be helped in anyway and since you don't start to make meritorious deeds in faith such as giving, serving, silas..., there is less chance that there is at least the questions real formulation "How to deal with an answer in contrary with my opinion", and to fix that is pointless since power holder will find ways to arrange them so that each of them gets enough food and share of the hunts.
There is really, and that have been checked in all ways and with all possibilities, no need for anybody have faith in the Three Gems a need to come back and one simply would waste his merits when engaging with peoples of wrong view.
Also this is not written to attack you or harm you, but to make you clear where you are, if you like to know it and try to walk a better. The deeds are up to you and those who think you need to feed together.
The Kindergarden does really not end, since if people are caught into wrong doings and deny it, such as it is when people are deliberately lying, the no more do anything else as to fight all what might underline there delusion and wrongness...
How compatible are the beliefs of atheists and Buddhism?
Mr. James Jenkins, valued Readers,
There are less how really define of what Atheism is and there are less
who understand Dhamma.
So if one asks: "Is believe and faith important for the Dhamma a
clear?" "YES, most! 'Right faith' is the prerequisite of the whole
practice of the Noble Eightfold Path."
And if ones asks: "Is it necessary to believe in deities and fine
physical beings?" "YES, most! As it is as a part of right view, right
faith and the prerequisite of the whole practice of the Noble
So if your or what ever Atheism does not have problem with such, it
has maybe some similarity but as for -isms they are naturally just
philosophies while Dhamma -Vinaya is a way of live, a way of practice
and not to create a world justification by thinking.
Mr./Mrs MischievousSage also catches good points. If one is interested
in liberation he would not find much food for that in such
Beliefsystems like secular Buddhism, yet there believe is neither
grounded by anyone, never was it heard that a secular teacher got
liberation and Atma guesses that all will agree that their Guru
Bachelor is even far away from entering the stream not to speak about
having abounded a single fetter but increased.
People who have joined such sects are really poor, they have nothing
as their believes to relay on, just that they maintain the idea to
know instead of making a step forward, guided by a certain perception
(Note: this answer has not been given with the agreement to be means
of trade or the purpose of/for trade and/or keep people trapped and
bound. How you handle it lies in your sphere, but does not excuse the
deed here either.)
deleted by ChrisW♦ yesterday
Why was your post deleted? See the help center.
answered Jan 14 at 8:08
This is unreferenced opinion (i.e. it states no reason/explanation to justify the opinion), and ad hominem (being rude/insulting about
other people and their teachers) ... so I'm deleting it. – ChrisW♦
So its really a truth, moderators at lage are nothing different to prostitutes, as long as something comes it which they can make a use of it, they will look like sweet and so much supportive, but as soon as they say that they can not nourish on you, then they show their true nature.
How could at Atheism possible have beliefs and teachers. The fact is, that this is not a place of Buddhism, but another place of thiefs of the heritage of the tipple gems. Atma would not sleep well only thinking on the punsh of demerits people are making here.
Just look at the "Can Buddha be a woman" topic. There are simply and exclusively moderators who give opinion answers and oppose and slander the teaching, like most the Buddha, the Dhamma and the Sangha.
You should really develop a amount of shame since that would be your only protection.