Here's a transcript of comments under this answer:
- This answer make sutta conflict themselves although the sutta never conflict in this case. If you use "sakko kāyo sakkāyo" in [Sakkāyasutta], Sakkāyasutta, which has only sakko, will conflict with Sacca-pabba of [Satipaṭṭhānasuttaṃ], which has both sakko and paro. – Bonn 9 hours ago
- No. This is unrelated to what i posted. Just because there is external kaya does not mean 'sakkaya ditthi' refers to external kaya. 'Sakkaya' is not found in MN 10 therefore your idea sounds very wrong & mistaken – Dhammadhatu 7 hours ago
- If you can not compare between Sutta. Saṃ. Kha. Sakkāyasutta, and MN 10 then mix it together, it means you have not enough skill to describe sakkāya-diṭṭhi. – Bonn 7 hours ago
- I just read someone refuting your mistakes on Dhammawheel. If you wish to debate, you should post there & not here. On Dhammawheel, i have never observed once your posts not shown to be wrong. – Dhammadhatu 6 hours ago
- No one refuting me in Dhammawheel, they trying to understand what I am describing. They are not like you, don't decide them like that.dhammawheel.com/… – Bonn 6 hours ago
- Also, you can debate me. So if you can do, why I can not act like you? – Bonn 6 hours ago
- This forum is not for debating. – Dhammadhatu 5 hours ago
- On DW, someone told you sakkaya is not kayanupassana because sakkaya is dhammanupassana, – Dhammadhatu 5 hours ago
- Even though your quote still be uneducated debate. I wrote "Sutta. Ma. Mū. Sacca-pabba of Satipaṭṭhānasuttaṃ". Saccapabba is in dhammānupassanā-satipaṭṭhāna, not kāyānupassanā-satipaṭṭhāna. I wrote right, he read wrong, what I can do? – Bonn 5 hours ago
- Also, Sutta. Saṃ. Kha. Sakkāyasutta which I comparing to MN10 is talking about sacca-pabba in dhammānupassanāsatipaṭṭhāna. Why he refer to kāyānupassanāsatipaṭṭhāna? – Bonn 5 hours ago
- So your quote trying to distort my answer. Why? Because you love to debate, not to understand. – Bonn 5 hours ago
I have highlighted:
- Phrases where someone comments on "you" instead of on the text
- Phrases which are a reply to a comment about you.
- Don't you think the discussion would be better without "you"?
- Could you try to avoid criticising "you" in future, and stick to the text?
Also what should a moderator do with comments like these?
- Pretend to ignore that it seems partially hostile?
- Delete everything?
- Move it all to chat?
- Edit specific comments and delete others?
It's work but moderators are able to edit comments --